Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results Pursuant to Court Decision
Notice ITA
Abstract (official)
On September 23, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in China Cornici Co., Ltd., and RaoPing HongRong Handicrafts Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court Nos. 23-00216 and 23-00217, Slip Op. 26-118, sustaining the Department of Commerce (Commerce) first remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on of wood mouldings and millwork products (millwork products) from the People's Republic of China (China) covering the period June 12, 2020, through December 31, 2021. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the rescission of the administrative review for China Cornici Co., Ltd. (China Cornici) and RaoPing HongRong Handicrafts Co., Ltd. (RaoPing) and the corresponding cash deposit rates assigned to these companies.
Frequently asked questions
What does “Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results Pursuant to Court Decision” require from importers?
Federal Register notice 2026-21038 (published 15 Oct 2026) is summarized by its official abstract: “On September 23, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in China Cornici Co., Ltd., and RaoPing HongRong Handicrafts Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court Nos. 23-00216 and 23-00217, Slip Op. 26-118, sustaining the Department of Commerce (Commerce) first remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD)…” Importers covered by this action should treat the full Federal Register text as authoritative before making entry or pricing decisions.
Who issued notice 2026-21038 and why does it matter?
It was issued by ITA and classified as a notice. ExportSonar tracks it because notices in this feed drive US tariff, customs-duty and trade-remedy procedure changes that alter landed-cost math.
Where can I verify notice 2026-21038?
The authoritative text is the Federal Register document itself; this ExportSonar page mirrors metadata only (retrieved 16 Oct 2026, 23:26 UTC). When the two differ, the Federal Register record wins — follow the Source link just below this section.
Source:
Federal Register — 2026-21038 · metadata retrieved .
More from the same agency: ITA.