← All trade remedy orders

Certain Softwood Lumber Products — C-122-858

US AD/CVD order record · dataset entry, not legal advice.

AD+CVD concurrent Active order
Program
AD+CVD concurrent
Status
Active order
Countries
Canada
Effective
2023-12-07
Latest event
2026-08-06
FR notice
Read the Federal Register notice →

Source: Federal Register · data retrieved 2026-10-16T16:08:19Z

Scope of the measure

See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 347 (January 3, 2018) (Order). The product covered by the Order is certain softwood lumber products from Canada. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum in the Final Results. Ministerial Errors Section 351.224(e) of Commerce's regulations provides that Commerce will analyze any comments received and, if appropriate, correct any ministerial error by amending the final results of the review. Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.224(f) define a ``ministerial error'' as an error ``in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical error resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other similar type of unintentional error which the Secretary considers ministerial.'' We analyzed the ministerial error comments and determined, in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e) and (f), that we made the following ministerial errors: See Memorandum, ``Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Ministerial Error Allegations in the Final Results,'' dated concurrently with this notice. (1) We incorrectly calculated JDIL's benefit under the New Brunswick License Management Fees. Therefore, we have corrected JDIL's License Management Fees benefit calculation in these amended final results, and we will incorporate JDIL's corrected total subsidy rate in the amended cash deposit instructions and liquidation instructions. (2) We incorrectly calculated JDIL's benefit under the Capital Cost Allowance for Class 1 Assets program. Although the resulting change in JDIL's benefit amount for this program will not change JDIL's subsidy rate when rounded to the nearest one-hundredth place, as we are already making other modifications to our calculations, we have determined to correct JDIL's license management fees benefit calculation in these amended final results. (3) We incorrectly calculated JDIL's benefit under the New Brunswick Gasoline & Fuel Tax Exemptions and Refund program. Therefore, we have corrected JDIL's license management fees benefit calculation in these amended final results, and we will incorporate JDIL's corrected total subsidy rate in the amended cash deposit instructions and liquidation instructions. (4) Finally, we incorrectly calculated West Fraser's benefit under the Coloured Fuel/British Columbia Coloured Fuel Certification program. Therefore, we have corrected West Fraser's benefit calculation in these amended final results, and we will incorporate West Fraser's corrected total subsidy rate in the amended cash deposit instructions and liquidation instructions. With regard to the petitioner's allegation that we incorrectly calculated the net subsidy rate for JDIL's LIREPP program, we find no ministerial error because we made a methodological decision in calculating the benefit for certain LIREPP credits. Regarding the petitioner's allegation that we incorrectly calculated the payments made to West Fraser for cruising and block layout activities, we agree with the petitioner that Commerce conducted an incorrect calculation of the potential benefit under this program, and further acknowledge that this type of error is one Commerce would typically correct as a ministerial error. However, such a correction would likely result in calculations upon which interested parties would be unable to brief or provide commentary, given the timing and nature of the change in this review. Accordingly, we are deferring a determination as to whether this program is countervailable until the next administrative review and, thus, not amending our calculation for this program in the Final Results. We find that the petitioner's allegation that Commerce used an incorrect sales denominator to calculate West Fraser's benefit under certain programs is untimely, because it was discoverable in the Preliminary Results, but not raised in the petitioner's case brief. Likewise, we find that Resolute's allegation that Commerce used an incorrect sales denominator to calculate Resolute's benefit under certain programs is untimely, because it was discoverable in the Preliminary Results, but not raised in the Resolute's case brief. As such, we are rejecting both of these allegations as untimely filed allegations. Company Name Corrections In the Final Results, we listed Chaleur Sawmills LP and Fornebu Lumber Company Inc., as non-selected exporters/producers. We, however, previously found that the successors-in-interest to Chaleur Sawmills LP and Fornebu Lumber Co. Inc. are Chaleur Forest Products LP and Chaleur Forest Products Inc. Consequently, we are correcting the companies that are subject to this administrative review to Chaleur Forest Products LP and Chaleur Forest Products Inc. See Appendix to this notice for a list of the non-selected exporters/producers subject to this review. See Final Results, 86 FR at 68470-71. See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Notice of Final Results of Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 86 FR 43189 (August 6, 2021).

Scope text quoted verbatim from the Federal Register notice. Scope text retrieved: 2026-10-19T16:17:45Z. Record last fetched: 2026-10-16T16:08:19Z. Verify against the official notice before relying on it.

HTS codes covered by this order

HTSUS (dotted)8-digitDescription (USITC reference)
4406.91.0044069100Coniferous
4407.11.0044071100Of pine (Pinus spp.)
4407.12.0044071200Of fir (Abies spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.)
4407.13.0044071300Of S-P-F (spruce (Picea spp.), pine (Pinus spp.) and fir (Abies spp.))
4407.14.0044071400Of Hem-fir (Western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) and fir (Abies spp.))
4407.19.0044071900Other
4409.10.0544091005Wood continuously shaped along any of its ends, whether or not also continuously shaped along any of its edges or faces, all the foregoing whether or not planed, sanded or end-jointed
4409.10.1044091010Wood siding
4409.10.2044091020Wood flooring
4409.10.4044091040Pine (Pinus spp.)
4409.10.4544091045Other
4409.10.5044091050Other
4409.10.6044091060Plain
4409.10.6544091065Sanded, grooved, or otherwise advanced in condition
4409.10.9044091090Other
4415.20.4044152040Containers designed for use in the harvesting of fruits and vegetables
4415.20.8044152080Other
4418.30.0144183001Posts and beams other than products of subheadings 4418.81 to 4418.89
4418.50.0044185000Shingles and shakes
4418.99.1044189910Drilled or notched lumber studs
4418.99.9144189991Other

The scope text also references HS prefix(es) 440710 that we do not yet resolve against our USITC HTS reference table; they are shown verbatim instead of being guessed.

Related orders — same primary origin

Quoting this shipment? Estimate its landed rate in the US tariff calculator, set up change alerts in a free ExportSonar account, or compare plan limits and pricing.

At a glance

What does US trade case C-122-858 cover?

The antidumping and countervailing measure covers Certain Softwood Lumber Products, imported from Canada. Case number C-122-858 is one of 540 active orders tracked in the database and was established 2023-12-07; the described product range determines which ten-digit lines inherit the cash-deposit obligation. Scope language in the Federal Register document controls.

Does case C-122-858 still collect cash deposits?

As of dataset vintage 2026-10-16T16:09:24Z, yes: importers entering covered goods post a cash deposit at the current rate until Commerce's next administrative review publishes revised margins in the Federal Register. Deposit rates can change every review cycle, so confirm the latest Federal Register notice before you quote a figure to your customs broker.

Which HTS codes fall under case C-122-858?

These HTS headings are recorded in the case linkage: 4406.91.00, 4407.11.00, 4407.12.00, 4407.13.00, 4407.14.00, 4407.19.00, 4409.10.05, 4409.10.10, 4409.10.20, 4409.10.40, 4409.10.45, 4409.10.50, 4409.10.60, 4409.10.65, 4409.10.90, 4415.20.40, 4415.20.80, 4418.30.01, 4418.50.00, 4418.99.10, 4418.99.91. Confirm the exact ten-digit code against the published scope language, because product descriptions rather than codes alone define the legal boundary of the order, and scope rulings occasionally widen or narrow which lines inherit the deposit obligation.

Primary sources: Federal Register — C-122-858 · USITC Harmonized Tariff Schedule — republished with provenance by exportsonar.com