← All trade remedy orders
Certain Low-Speed Personal Transportation Vehicles — A-570-176
US AD/CVD order record · dataset entry, not legal advice.
AD+CVD concurrent
Active order
- Program
- AD+CVD concurrent
- Status
- Active order
- Countries
- China
- Effective
- 2025-08-12
- Latest event
- 2025-08-12
- FR notice
- Read the Federal Register notice →
Source: Federal Register · data retrieved 2026-10-16T14:02:45Z
Scope of the measure
The product covered by these orders is LSPTVs from China. For a complete description of the scope of these orders, see Appendix I to this notice. Amendment to the Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value On June 30, 2025, Commerce received timely ministerial error allegations from the petitioner alleging that Commerce made three ministerial errors in the LTFV Final Determination with respect to the estimated weighted-average dumping margin for the mandatory respondents Guangdong Lvtong New Energy Electric Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd. (Guangdong Lvtong) and Xiamen Dalle New Energy Automobile Co., Ltd. (Xiamen Dalle) (collectively, the respondents). Commerce reviewed the record, and we determine that two of the three allegations concerning Xiamen Dalle constitute ministerial errors within the meaning of section 735(e) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f). Consistent with 19 CFR 351.224(e), Commerce is amending the LTFV Final Determination to reflect the correction of these two ministerial errors. Correction of these ministerial errors changes Xiamen Dalle's final estimated weighted-average dumping margin from 312.31 percent to 312.54 percent. As a result, we are also revising the estimated weighted-average dumping margin assigned to the separate rate companies from 291.04 percent to 292.03 percent. The amended estimated weighted-average dumping margins are listed in the ``Amended Final Determination'' section below. See Petitioner's Ministerial Error Allegation. See Memorandum, ``Analysis of Ministerial Errors Allegations,'' dated July 23, 2025 (Final Ministerial Error Memorandum). See Memorandum, ``Calculation of the Margin for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination for the Amended Final Determination,'' dated July 23, 2025. AD Order On August 4, 2025, in accordance with 735(d) of the Act, the ITC notified Commerce of its final determination that an industry in the United States is materially injured within the meaning of section 735(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Act by reason of imports of LSPTVs that are sold in the United States at LTFV. Therefore, in accordance with sections 735(c)(2) and 736 of the Act, Commerce is issuing this AD order. Because the ITC determined that imports of LSPTVs from China are materially injuring a U.S. industry, unliquidated entries of such merchandise from China, entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, are subject to the assessment of antidumping duties. Therefore, in accordance with section 736(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, antidumping duties equal to the amount by which the normal value of the subject merchandise exceeds the export price (or constructed export price) of the subject merchandise, for all relevant entries of LSPTVs from China. Antidumping duties will be assessed on unliquidated entries of LSPTVs from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after January 30, 2025, the date of publication of the LTFV Preliminary Determination, but will not include entries occurring after the expiration of the provisional measures period and before publication of the ITC's final injury determination, as further described in the ``Provisional Measures--AD '' section of this notice. See Certain Low Speed Personal Transportation Vehicles from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sale at Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation, Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional Measures, 90 FR 8517 (January 30, 2025) (LTFV Preliminary Determination). Furthermore, both Commerce and the ITC found that critical circumstances exist for LSTPVs from China produced and exported by Guangdong Lvtong, LSTPVs from China produced and exported by the non- examined separate rate companies (see Appendix II), and LSTPVs from China produced or exported by the China-wide entity; critical circumstances were not found for LSPTVs from China produced and exported by Xiamen Dalle. Accordingly, Commerce will direct CBP to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, antidumping duties equal to the amount by which the normal value of the subject merchandise exceeds the export price (or constructed export price) of the subject merchandise, for all entries of LSPTVs from China, except those produced and exported by Xiamen Dalle, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after November 1, 2024 through January 29, 2025 (i.e., 90 days prior to the date of publication of the LTFV Preliminary Determination). Suspension of Liquidation and Cash Deposit Requirements--AD In accordance with section 736 of the Act, Commerce intends to instruct CBP to continue the suspension of liquidation of entries of LSPTVs from China, effective on the date of publication of the ITC's final affirmative injury determination in the Federal Register. Commerce also intends to instruct CBP to require cash deposits equal to the estimated weighted-average dumping margins, as revised in this amended final determination and adjusted for subsidy offsets, as indicated in the table below. The rate for the China-wide entity applies to all producer and exporter combinations not specifically listed below in the Amended Final Determination. These instructions suspending liquidation and cash deposit requirements will remain in effect until further notice.
Scope text quoted verbatim from the Federal Register notice. Scope text retrieved: 2026-10-19T16:17:45Z. Record last fetched: 2026-10-16T14:02:45Z. Verify against the official notice before relying on it.
HTS codes covered by this order
| HTSUS (dotted) | 8-digit | Description (USITC reference) |
|---|
| 8703.10.10 | 87031010 | Vehicles specially designed for traveling on snow |
| 8703.10.50 | 87031050 | Other |
| 8703.90.01 | 87039001 | Other |
| 8706.00.03 | 87060003 | For vehicles of subheading 8704.21 or 8704.31 |
| 8706.00.05 | 87060005 | Other |
| 8706.00.15 | 87060015 | For vehicles of heading 8703 |
| 8706.00.25 | 87060025 | For vehicles of heading 8705 |
| 8706.00.30 | 87060030 | For tractors suitable for agricultural use |
| 8706.00.50 | 87060050 | Other |
| 8707.10.00 | 87071000 | For vehicles of heading 8703 |
Related orders — same primary origin
Quoting this shipment? Estimate its landed rate in the US tariff calculator, set up change alerts in a free ExportSonar account, or compare plan limits and pricing.
At a glance
- Case A-570-176 · AD+CVD concurrent · Active · established 2025-08-12
What does US trade case A-570-176 cover?
The antidumping and countervailing measure covers Certain Low-Speed Personal Transportation Vehicles, imported from China. Case number A-570-176 is one of 540 active orders tracked in the database and was established 2025-08-12; the described product range determines which ten-digit lines inherit the cash-deposit obligation. Scope language in the Federal Register document controls.
Does case A-570-176 still collect cash deposits?
As of dataset vintage 2026-10-16T16:09:24Z, yes: importers entering covered goods post a cash deposit at the current rate until Commerce's next administrative review publishes revised margins in the Federal Register. Deposit rates can change every review cycle, so confirm the latest Federal Register notice before you quote a figure to your customs broker.
Which HTS codes fall under case A-570-176?
These HTS headings are recorded in the case linkage: 8703.10.10, 8703.10.50, 8703.90.01, 8706.00.03, 8706.00.05, 8706.00.15, 8706.00.25, 8706.00.30, 8706.00.50, 8707.10.00. Confirm the exact ten-digit code against the published scope language, because product descriptions rather than codes alone define the legal boundary of the order, and scope rulings occasionally widen or narrow which lines inherit the deposit obligation.
Primary sources: Federal Register — A-570-176 · USITC Harmonized Tariff Schedule — republished with provenance by exportsonar.com