Kemper Snowboards; snowboard ski boot; footwear; sports footwear; ski boot; upper of textile material; upper less than 50 percent leather; outer sole of plastics.

Active· CBP ruling HQ 087459· Issued 1990-10-02

Ruling
HQ 087459
Issued
Status
Active
Category
Classification
HS prefixes
6404.11
Tariff numbers
6404.11.90

Ruling text

HQ 087459

                          October 2, 1990

   CLA-2 CO:R:C:G 087459 KWM

   CATEGORY: Classification

   TARIFF NO.: 6404.11.90

   Ms. Jane Laurie
   Air Express International Agency, Inc.
   8500 Osage Avenue
   Los Angeles, California  90034

   RE:  Kemper Snowboards; snowboard ski boot; footwear; sports
        footwear; ski boot; upper of textile material; upper less
        than 50 percent leather; outer sole of plastics.

   Dear Ms. Laurie:

        This will acknowledge receipt of your letter dated May
   31, 1990, regarding the tariff classification of boots for
   snowboard skiing. Your letter and samples of the goods have
   been forwarded to this office for a ruling.  After
   consideration of the information and samples you provided, we
   have determined that the boots should be classified as set
   forth below.

   FACTS:

        Your correspondence requested a classification ruling for
   two styles of boot, both for use with a snowboard ski.
   Because you have provided a description and sample for only
   one style, our holding here is binding only for that style.
   However we have suggested what we believe is the appropriate
   classification for the second style based on our experience
   with similar merchandise.

        The boot styles at issue here are referred to by you as
   the "Alpine" and "Flight" models.  A sample of the "Alpine"
   model was included with your request.   It consists of two
   parts: a removable inner liner and an outer shell.  The
   information included with your letter indicates that the "foot
   portion" of the shell is made of molded plastic.  Likewise,
   the outer sole is entirely of plastic.  The upper portion of
   the shell is made of a thick plastic layer to which a white
   woven fabric lining and a black woven fabric outer layer are
   laminated.  The tongue of the boot is plastic, as are the
   decorative overlays.

        The "Flight" model is identical in most respects except
   that the uppers are described as being of leather rather than
   plastic laminated with textile material.

   ISSUE:

        How are these goods classified under the Harmonized

   Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated?

   LAW AND ANALYSIS:

        Classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
   the United States Annotated (HTSUSA) is made in accordance
   with the General Rules of Interpretation (GRI's).  The
   systematic detail of the harmonized system is such that
   virtually all goods are classified by application of GRI 1,
   that is, according to the terms of the headings of the tariff
   schedule and any relevant Section or Chapter Notes.  In the
   event that the goods cannot be classified solely on the basis
   of GRI 1, and if the headings and legal notes do not otherwise
   require, the remaining GRIs may be applied, taken in order.

        Although your letter did not expressly state that such
   was the case, we assume for the purposes of this ruling that
   the liner and outer shell will be imported as a retail unit.
   Classification of the outer shell component, therefore, will
   provide classification for the merchandise as a whole.

        The headings of Chapter 64 provide for the classification
   of footwear.  The provisions of each heading are distinguished
   by the component material which comprises the outer sole
   and/or the upper.  We note that heading 6404, HTSUSA, may
   include this merchandise.  It provides for, in pertinent part:

        6404      Footwear with outer soles of rubber, plastics,
                  leather or composition leather and uppers of
                  textile materials:

                       Footwear with outer soles of rubber or
                       plastics:

   In this case, classification in heading 6404, HTSUSA, hinges
   on the determination that the plastics and textile uppers of
   these boots are classified as textile materials.  We believe
   that they are.  Our decision is based on the information you
   provided, and an examination which indicates that the surface
   of the uppers is primarily textile material according to Legal
   Note 4(a) to Chapter 64 (no account be taken of ornamentation,
   etc.).  This finding is subject to verification by the port of
   entry.
        Within heading 6404, HTSUSA, subheading 6404.11, HTSUSA,
   provides for:

        6404.11             Sports footwear; tennis shoes,
                            basketball shoes, gym shoes, training
                            shoes and the like:

   The term "sports footwear" is defined in Subheading Legal Note
   1 to Chapter 64, HTSUSA, as:

        1.   For the purposes of subheading 6402.11, 6402.19,
             6403.19, and 6404.11, the expression "sports
             footwear" applies only to:

             (a)  Footwear which is designed for a sporting
                  activity and has, or has provision for the
                  attachment of spikes, sprigs, cleats, stops,
                  clips bars or the like;

             (b)  Skating boots, ski-boots, and cross-country ski
                  footwear, wrestling boots, boxing boots and
                  cycling shoes.

   (Emphasis added). Further, Additional U.S. Legal Note 2
   provides that:

        2.   For the purposes of this chapter, the term "tennis
             shoes, basketball shoes, gym shoes, training shoes
             and the like" covers athletic footwear other than
             sports footwear (as defined in note 1 above),
             whether or not principally used for such athletic
             games or purposes.

   (Emphasis added).  We need not decide here whether the "ski-
   boots" described as sports footwear in Subheading Legal Note
   1(b) encompasses goods such as these.  The provisions of the
   subheading read in conjunction with the Legal Notes, as
   prescribed by GRI 1, clearly indicate that the instant
   merchandise is encompassed by the subheading terms regardless
   of whether we consider them "ski-boots"  "sports footwear" or
   "athletic footwear other than sports footwear."  That intent
   is obvious from a reading of the tariff provisions.  The
   instant merchandise is a type of footwear, and snowboarding
   (or snowboard skiing) is as much a sport (or athletic
   activity) as the other activities specified in the subheading
   and legal notes.  Further, the notes make clear that, at least
   for "athletic footwear", the item need not be used principally
   for such athletic purposes.  It is sufficient, as in this
   case, that the boots possess attributes which indicate their
   suitability for a sport or activity:  a stiff sole, textile
   laminated plastic uppers, and an insulated liner.  Some
   features distinguish the sample boots from ordinary insulated
   winter boots; other are more common.

        Footwear with less than 50 percent exterior surface of
   leather is classified in the "other" provisions of 6404.11,
   HTSUSA.  This subheading is further divided based on the value
   per pair.  The instant goods described as the "Alpine" style
   have less than 50 percent exterior surface of leather, and are
   valued at over $12.00 per pair.  We believe that the goods
   described as the "Flight" style would have uppers of which
   over 50 percent of the external surface area is leather (See
   subheading 6404.11.20, HTSUSA).

   HOLDING:

        The goods described as "Alpine" style snowboard boots are
   classified as "sports" or athletic footwear included in
   subheading 6404.11.90, having uppers of which less than 50
   percent is leather, valued at over $12.00 per pair.  These
   goods are dutiable at the rate of 20 percent ad valorem.

        No binding classification is provided for the goods
   described as "Flight" style snowboard boots due to the absence
   of an adequate description and/or a representative sample.



                                      Sincerely,

                                      John A. Durant
                                      Director
                                      Commercial Rulings Division

Source: rulings.cbp.gov — ruling 087459, retrieved 2026-10-12T05:19:52Z, republished verbatim. This digest is informational; only CBP issues binding rulings.

Back to all CROSS rulings