Leather footwear uppers

Active· CBP ruling HQ 085291· Issued 1990-03-01

Ruling
HQ 085291
Issued
Status
Active
Category
Classification
HS prefixes
6406.10
Tariff numbers
6406.10.6500

Ruling text

HQ 085291

                                     March 1, 1990


            CLA-2  CO:R:C:G 085291 DFC

            CATEGORY: Classification

            TARIFF NO.: 6406.10.6500

            Leonard L. Rosenberg, Esq.
            Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg
            Attorneys at Law
            444 Brickell Avenue
            Miami, Florida 33131-2470

            RE:  Leather footwear uppers

            Dear Mr. Rosenberg:

                 In a letter dated July 26, 1989, on behalf of G.H. Bass
            Caribbean, Inc., you inquired as to the tariff classification
            of footwear uppers produced in the Dominican Republic.  Samples
            were submitted for examination.

            FACTS:

                 The samples consist of 11 half pairs of moccasin uppers in
            their condition as imported and the 11 half pairs of the same
            uppers after they have received the final lasting by being
            attached to a cardboard half-insole in the rear. You point out
            that in all cases the opening in the bottom extends to the heel
            of the upper.  Further, none of the uppers can be bottomed
            without further processing on a heel seat lasting machine.

                 The sample uppers involved may be described as follows:

            Description       Pattern No.  Stock No.  Bottom opening

            Women's Rangeley    10177        1132W      1 3/8" x 2"
            Deck pattern

            Women's Rangeley    10182        1155W      1" x 2 1/2"
            Slip-On

            Signature Shoe      10371        1242       1 1/4" x 5 1/2"
            Kiltie Tassel-
             Columbia















                                          -2-


            Women's Rangeley    10453        1007       1" x 2 1/2"
            Penny Pattern

            Men's Rangeley      10191        1015       3/4" x 2 3/4"
            Deck Pattern

            Men's Rangeley      10397        1067       1 1/8" x 2 1/2"
            Slip-On

            Penny Pattern       10367         731       1" x 5 1/5"

            Men's Rangeley      10356        1083       1" x 4"
            Three-Quarter
            Boot

            Tassel Pattern      10367-1       637       1 1/4" x 5 1/2"

            Women's Weejuns     10183         721       1" x 4 3/4"

            Signature Shoe      10406        1600       1 1/4" x 5 1/5"
            Kiltie Tassel

                 It is your opinion that the samples are properly
            classifiable under subheading 6406.10.6500, Harmonized Tariff
            Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA), as parts of
            footwear, uppers and parts thereof, other, of leather.

            ISSUE:

                 Are these samples considered formed uppers for tariff
            purposes?

            LAW AND ANALYSIS:

                 Additional U.S. Note to Chapter 64, HTSUSA, reads in
            pertinent part as follows:

                 . . . Provisions for "formed uppers" cover uppers, with
                 closed bottoms, which have been shaped by lasting, molding
                 or otherwise but not by simply closing at the bottom.

                 It is our observation that all the samples are front-part
            and back-part lasted with the exception of stock 721 which is
            not back-part lasted.

















                                          -3-


                 In Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 082075 dated
            December 1, 1988, this office stated that "[w]e construe the
            phrase closed bottoms as uppers which are substantially closed.
            (Emphasis added.)  It is our view that substantially closed
            means that more of the lower surface that is intended to cover
            the bottom of the foot is present, than is absent."  In HRL
            082573 dated December 28, 1989, this office modified this
            position stating that we "are now of the opinion that uppers
            which have substantial openings cut out of the bottoms, as is
            the case here, are not closed within the meaning of Additional
            Note 4 to Chapter 64, Supra.

                 In our decision of December 1, 1988, supra, this office
            held that certain footwear uppers which were not back-part
            lasted and needed to be soaked, re-lasted and dried after
            importation in order to obtain their final shape, are not
            formed uppers for tariff purposes.

                 In view of the foregoing, none of the samples can be
            considered a formed upper for tariff purposes since they have
            substantial openings in their bottoms.  Additionally, stock 721
            is also precluded from being considered a formed upper because
            it is not back-part lasted.

            HOLDING:

                 The sample uppers are classifiable under subheading
            6406.10.6500, HTSUSA, as parts of footwear, uppers and parts
            thereof, other, of leather, with duty at the general rate of
            3.7 percent ad valorem or entitled to free entry under the
            Generalized System of Preferences or the Caribbean Economic
            Recovery Act, if otherwise qualified.

                                        Sincerely,




                                        John Durant, Director
                                        Commercial Rulings Division





















            6cc AD NY Seaport
            1cc Dist Dir Miami
            1cc Dist Dir San Juan
            1cc James Sheridan
            cahill library/peh
            085291

Source: rulings.cbp.gov — ruling 085291, retrieved 2026-10-12T05:18:54Z, republished verbatim. This digest is informational; only CBP issues binding rulings.

Back to all CROSS rulings