Classification of cotton fabric

Active· CBP ruling HQ 080144· Issued 1988-05-18

Ruling
HQ 080144
Issued
Status
Active
Category
Classification
HS prefixes
5208.12
Tariff numbers
5208.12.6020

Ruling text

HQ 080144

                                    May 18, 1988


          CLA-2 CO:R:C:G  080144  CMR

          CATEGORY: Classification

          TARIFF NO: 320.3923; 5208.12.6020

          Mrs. D. W. S. Wai
          British Embassy
          Hong Kong Office
          3100 Massachusetts Ave., N.W.
          Washington, D.C.  20008

          RE: Classification of cotton fabric

          Dear Mrs. Wai:

              This is in response to your letter of April 15, 1987,
          requesting classification of a cotton print fabric imported into
          the United States by Pacific Coast Feather from Hong Kong.  Three
          shipments are being held at Seattle for want of a correct visa.
          A sample accompanied the ruling request.

          FACTS:

              The submitted sample is a plain woven cotton fabric weighing
          3.81 ounces per square yard.  It contains 132 single threads per
          inch in the warp and 90 single threads per inch in the filling.
          It is constructed with 40/1 c.c. yarns in both the warp and the
          filling and the yarns have been carded.  The fabric does not
          appear to have been bleached or colored and has not been napped.
          Based on the data provided, the average yarn number for this
          merchandise has been calculated to be 39.

              The Hong Kong Trade Department contends that this fabric fits
          Hong Kong's classification guidelines for category 315 and was
          improperly assigned category 314 when entered through the Seattle
          seaport.  The Hong Kong Trade Department bases its contention on
          the guidelines in Notice to Exporters No. 50/83 of October 22,
          1983.

          ISSUE:

              Whether the fabric at issue falls within textile category 314
          or 315.















                                         -2-


          LAW AND ANALYSIS:

              In order to determine the proper textile category designation
          for this fabric, we must first classify it under the Tariff
          Schedules of the United States Annotated (TSUSA).  The textile
          category designation is determined from the tariff classification
          and cannot be accurately predicted from the textile guidelines.
          Based on the data provided, the fabric is woven, wholly of
          cotton, not fancy or figured, not bleached and not colored and
          classifiable in item 320.39  , Tariff Schedules of the United
          States (TSUS).  The next step is to determine the statistical
          suffix that applies by reference to the Statistical Suffix Table
          for Items 320.01 through 331.  .  The fabric meets the definition
          for poplin or broadcloth in Statistical Headnote 1(e), Subpart A,
          Part 3, Schedule 3, which provides for "fabrics of plain weave,
          not of square construction, whether or not napped...."  It should
          be noted that the construction of this fabric is not square as
          defined in Statistical Headnote 1(q), Subpart A, Part 3, Schedule
          3, which states in part:

              Square construction:  Fabrics of the following types--

              ...containing 200 or more warp ends and filling picks per
              square inch in which the total count of warp ends per inch
              and the total count of filling picks per inch are each less
              than 57 percent of the total count per square inch of such
              warp ends and filling picks.

          Since 132 warp ends divided by 222 warp ends and filling picks
          equals 59.45 percent, this fabric is not of square construction.

              It therefore follows that this fabric must fall within the
          statistical suffixes that cover poplin or broadcloth (suffixes 12
          through 26).  Suffixes 12 and 13 cannot apply since they require
          a fabric over 5 ounces per square yard.  Suffixes 14, 15, 16, and
          17 cannot apply because they cover fabric with yarns of different
          colors.  Suffixes 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22 also do not apply to the
          merchandise since these statistical suffixes cover only fabric
          having 28 to 39 more warp ends than filling picks per inch.  This
          fabric has 42 more warp ends than filling picks per inch.  Suffix
          24 does not apply because the fabric is not fancy or figured and
          suffixes 25 and 26 are eliminated since the fabric is not napped.
          This analysis leaves us with the only suffix which completely
          fits the characteristics of this fabric, statistical suffix 23.

              This fabric cannot be classified as printcloth, since the
          definition for printcloth requires that the fabric be of square
          construction.  Note Statistical Headnote 1(b), Subpart A, Part 3,
          Schedule 3, for the tariff definition for printcloth.  Our
          analysis has demonstrated that this fabric is not of square











                                         -3-


          construction.  Your reliance on the textile guidelines in Notice
          to Exporters No. 50/83 of October 22, 1983, is misplaced.  These
          guidelines were obsolete at the time this entry was made since
          they were based partially on the 1983 TSUSA.

          HOLDING:

              The fabric at issue is classifiable in item 320.3923, TSUSA,
          which is correlated with textile category 314.  It is dutiable at
          the 1986 rate of 10.5 percent ad valorem.

              Under the proposed Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
          States Annotated (HTSUSA), the fabric is classifiable in
          subheading 5208.12.6020, textile category 314.  The rate of duty
          is 9 percent ad valorem.  This classification represents the
          present position of the Customs Service under the proposed
          HTSUSA.  If changes occur before enactment, this advice may not
          continue to be applicable.

                                          Sincerely,



                                          John Durant
                                          Acting Director
                                          Commercial Rulings Division



































          6cc: Area Director, New York Seaport
          1cc: CITA
          1cc: NIS Alan Tytelman

Source: rulings.cbp.gov — ruling 080144, retrieved 2026-10-12T05:17:51Z, republished verbatim. This digest is informational; only CBP issues binding rulings.

Back to all CROSS rulings