US FTA Duty-Free Eligibility: A Checklist Across All 14 Trade Agreements

Last updated October 13, 2026·Data: USITC HTS export 2026-10-09; FTA roster audited against primary sources 2026-10-13

Short answer: the United States maintains 14 free trade agreements covering 20 partner economies, and in the current schedule every single populated Special-rate cell — 14,689 of 23,193 tariff lines — sits on a line that otherwise pays a positive general duty. Zero of them decorate lines that are already duty-free for everyone. That asymmetry is the whole commercial point of this article: an FTA claim is worth real money precisely where the general rate is highest, and worthless where the schedule is already free. Below we map which agreement covers what, how long each took from signature to first day of savings, and what an importer must actually document to claim the rate.

What the Special column is actually offering

The Harmonized Tariff Schedule prints three rate columns on every line: General, Special, and Column 2. The Special subcolumn is where trade programs live — reciprocal free trade agreements plus unilateral preference programs such as GSP. We parsed all 23,193 administrative lines in our October 2026 extract of the schedule and found 14,689 carrying a populated Special cell. Each of those cells reads Free followed by a parenthesized list of program symbols.

The counterintuitive part, and the reason this page exists: not one of those 14,689 preferential lines has a Free general rate. The Special column never redundantly repeats what the schedule already grants. Among the lines it does populate, 12,112 charge a plain ad valorem percentage in the general column (the median is 6.0%, the mean about 9.1%), 2,283 charge specific or compound duties mixing dollars-per-unit with percentages, and 294 carry quota-rate or other textual provisions.

Practical translation: if your product's line shows a Special cell and your origin's symbol is inside the parentheses, the discount equals the entire general rate. On the median dutiable line that is 6% of customs value; on apparel-type lines it can be 32%; on tobacco leaf it reaches 350%. The symbol list is the difference between quoting a customer a landed price and guessing one.

The roster: 14 agreements, 20 partner economies

Our agreement roster was rebuilt and audited line-by-line against primary sources — each record's USTR agreement page fetched live, cross-checked against CBP's implementation-and-expiration table, with Federal Register Proclamation 8332 and CRS report RS21846 used where USTR pages are silent. The audit corrected four date errors inherited from secondary sources, including Oman's entry-into-force year (2006 → 2009) and Israel's effective date (September 1, not August 19). Eight of the fourteen records are anchored to directly fetched government primaries on every date field; the remaining six are verified-partial because congress.gov treaty documents reject automated access, leaving signature dates corroborated only by CRS or rendered search copies.

AgreementPartner economiesIn force sinceSigned → effective
Israel FTAIL1985-09-01132 days
Jordan FTAJO2001-12-17419 days
Singapore FTASG2004-01-01240 days
Chile FTACL2004-01-01209 days
Australia FTAAU2005-01-01228 days
Morocco FTAMA2006-01-01565 days
CAFTA-DRCR, DO, GT, HN, NI, SV2006-03-01573 days
Bahrain FTABH2006-08-01686 days
Oman FTAOM2009-01-011,078 days
Peru TPAPE2009-02-011,026 days
Korea (KORUS)KR2012-03-151,720 days
Colombia TPACO2012-05-152,001 days
Panama TPAPA2012-10-311,952 days
USMCAMX, CA2020-07-01579 days

What the signature-to-effect gap teaches buyers

Sort the gaps and a pattern emerges: the median agreement took 576 days from signature to entry into force, the fastest (Israel, 1985) needed only 132, and the slowest (Colombia, signed November 2006) waited 2,001 days — five and a half years — before its first duty-free entry could be claimed. Panama took 1,952 days and KORUS 1,720, the latter inflated by renegotiation in 2018. For a sourcing manager the lesson is concrete: an FTA announced in the news is a planning signal, not a rate. Budget roughly a year and a half between headline and usable preference, and treat anything faster as unusually quick.

Coverage differences that change sourcing decisions

Coverage is nearly universal but not identical, and the exceptions cluster where it hurts. Counting lines whose Special cell contains each agreement's symbol:

Because none of these lines is otherwise duty-free, each count doubles as “lines where this agreement saves real money.” And the overlap is overwhelming in the other direction too: 14,112 lines carry all fourteen FTA symbols at once, while just 577 lines extend preference to some agreements but not others. Those 577 exclusions are where origin strategy gets interesting — a supplier switch from, say, Korea to Australia is free of tariff consequence on 96.1% of the preferential schedule, but the residual 3.9% is concentrated in sensitive categories where the choice of origin changes the bill outright.

Worked examples: what the claim is worth

Knit tops to the US under USMCA. Line 6110.30.30.59 (women's or girls' knit pullovers, 25%+ cotton by weight, statistical suffix 59) carries a general rate of 32% and prints the S symbol. A $100,000 customs-value shipment lands with a $32,000 duty bill at the general rate; with a valid USMCA claim and the required certificate of origin, the base-schedule duty is $0. Even after paying a broker to assemble the origin package, the margin speaks for itself.

T-shirts under the Australia agreement. Women's cotton T-shirts, line 6109.90.10.65, also sit at 32% general with AU in the Special cell — the same arithmetic applies. Note that Australia runs the smallest FTA footprint (14,425 lines), so Australian shippers should verify the specific line rather than assume blanket coverage.

An honest small case: Korean auto parts. The highest-rate line in heading 8708 reachable with a KR claim is 8708.99.81.80 at just 2.5%. The claim works, but it is worth pennies per hundred dollars — a reminder that FTA eligibility is a necessary condition, not a windfall. Screen your specific code before celebrating.

The four gates between you and the zero

  1. Origin. Goods must qualify as originating under the specific agreement's rule of origin — tariff-shift, tariff-change or regional-value tests vary by program and by chapter.
  2. Documentation. Certifications or declarations per the program's format; USMCA requires a set of nine data elements even on the simplified template.
  3. Shipment path. Several statutes require direct consignment or non-entry into commerce en route.
  4. The claim itself. The special-program indicator must be transmitted on the entry. CBP does not refund silently — an unclaimed preference is simply paid duty.

Even a perfect claim clears only the base schedule. Chapter 99 measures — safeguards, Section 232/301-type actions, reciprocity provisions — layer on top regardless of preferential origin, and entry fees continue to accrue; see our guide to MPF and HMF entry fees. The symbol decoder in our Special-column explainer covers every letter including the unilateral programs.

A five-minute pre-order workflow

  1. Resolve the product to a ten-digit code — start from the chapter index if you only know the product name.
  2. Read the Special cell. Symbol absent for your origin? The general rate is your floor; price accordingly.
  3. Symbol present? Run the FTA eligibility checker, then confirm the rule of origin with your supplier before the goods ship.
  4. Recompute landed cost with the duty and landed-cost calculator, Chapter 99 layers included.
  5. For multi-SKU catalogs, batch-screen the whole book of codes with the free ExportSonar account and let monitoring flag when a line's symbols change.

Methodology and data freshness

Tariff-line statistics come from the USITC HTS REST export captured 2026-10-09T17:43Z (23,193 records). A line counts toward an agreement's coverage if its Special cell contains that agreement's symbol token; the general-rate classification (ad valorem / specific-compound / other) follows the leading token of the general string. Agreement dates come from our roster dataset, whose second-pass audit on 2026-10-13 re-fetched all fourteen source URLs live (14/14 HTTP 200), re-adjudicated the CBP implementation table, and fixed zero new discrepancies beyond the four corrected in the first pass. Nothing here is legal advice; for binding determinations consult your broker or counsel.

Frequently asked questions

How do I know if my product qualifies for an FTA rate?

Look up your exact ten-digit HTS line, read the Special subcolumn, and find your origin country's program symbol in the parenthesized list. If the symbol is there, the line is duty-free for qualifying goods - then you must satisfy the agreement's rule of origin and claim the rate on entry with the correct special-program indicator. Our FTA eligibility checker walks through the same steps against the live schedule.

Do all US free trade agreement partners get duty-free treatment on everything?

No. In the October 2026 schedule, 14,689 of 23,193 tariff lines carry a populated Special cell, and coverage differs by agreement: Australia's symbol appears on 14,425 of those lines while Oman's appears on all 14,689. Fourteen agreements also span 20 partner economies because CAFTA-DR covers six countries and USMCA covers two.

What is the difference between signing an FTA and it taking effect?

Signature starts the ratification and implementation clock; tariff elimination only begins when the agreement enters into force. Across the 14 US FTAs the signed-to-effective gap runs from 132 days (Israel, 1985) to 2,001 days (Colombia, 2006-2012), with a median of 576 days - so announced deals are planning signals, not rates you can claim yet.

Does the Special column ever show Free when the General rate is already Free?

In our extract, none do: zero of the 14,689 populated Special cells sit on lines whose General rate is Free. Wherever a symbol prints, the base schedule charges a positive rate - 12,112 of those lines are straight ad valorem (median 6.0%), 2,283 carry specific or compound rates, and 294 use quota or other textual rates.

Which US FTA has been in force the longest?

The Israel-United States Free Trade Area, in force since September 1, 1985 - still the oldest, and also the fastest from signature to effect at 132 days. The newest is USMCA, in force July 1, 2020. Every date in this article was audited against USTR agreement pages, the CBP implementation table and CRS report RS21846 on 2026-10-13; eight records are fully primary-verified and six are verified-partial on signature dates only.

Sources: USITC Harmonized Tariff Schedule · USTR Free Trade Agreements